<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>LegalRepublic.in</title>
  <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in</link>
  <description>India&#39;s daily legal news — Supreme Court, High Courts, Tribunals and Commissions</description>
  <language>en-IN</language>
  <atom:link href="https://www.legalrepublic.in/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:40:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <item>
    <title>He told his friends to keep an eye on the men who had arrived, and within an hour one of them was bleeding to death at the gate</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/jharkhand-hc/three-convictions-upheld-for-a-stabbing-at-a-golden-wedding-party-common-intention-inferred/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/jharkhand-hc/three-convictions-upheld-for-a-stabbing-at-a-golden-wedding-party-common-intention-inferred/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Sujit Narayan Prasad and Sanjay Prasad dismissed three appeals, held that restraining those who came to help establishes common intention, and rejected an alibi contradicted by the marriage card.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A student entering a four-year course should know at the threshold what it will cost, and the State&#39;s seven-year delay is not a reason to change the price halfway</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/professional-course-fees-cannot-be-raised-midstream-fee-fixation-committees-must-be-institutionalised/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/professional-course-fees-cannot-be-raised-midstream-fee-fixation-committees-must-be-institutionalised/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe upheld the Calcutta High Court&#39;s refund directions on their own reasoning, and told High Courts to police whether fee fixation committees are actually functioning.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The Board proved the new bids were lower than the bidders&#39; own old ones, and never proved they were lower than what the market would pay. Those are not the same conclusions</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/a-bidders-own-earlier-bid-is-not-the-measure-of-market-value-sand-auction-cancellation-quashed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/a-bidders-own-earlier-bid-is-not-the-measure-of-market-value-sand-auction-cancellation-quashed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:30:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi restored two cancelled sand-mining auctions worth over ₹100 crore a year, refused a remand, and halted the later tender for those two districts.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A ₹22.6 crore claim settled at ₹1.34 lakh, and the Revenue&#39;s appeal against it died on a clock it started 35 days late</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/section-62-ibc-limitation-runs-from-pronouncement-not-from-when-the-party-collects-the-copy/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/section-62-ibc-limitation-runs-from-pronouncement-not-from-when-the-party-collects-the-copy/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria held that &amp;ldquo;receipt of such order&amp;rdquo; in Section 62 of the IBC cannot mean the day a litigant chooses to collect a certified copy, and dismissed the appeal 16 days beyond the Court&#39;s power to condone.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Five days to forward the arrest material did not vitiate the arrest, but twenty months in custody with 98 witnesses to go did earn bail</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/pmla-section-19-immediately-does-not-mean-24-hours-but-twenty-months-custody-earns-bail/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/pmla-section-19-immediately-does-not-mean-24-hours-but-twenty-months-custody-earns-bail/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:20:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi rejected the Section 19(2) challenge on practicalities and then granted bail in a ₹6,210 crore money laundering case because process must not become punishment.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A trust holding property under a Farman of the Nizam was told it had cited the wrong rule, and lost its objection without anyone comparing the boundaries</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/waqf-trust-in-possession-cannot-be-evicted-on-the-wrong-rule-number-order-xxi-rule-97-inquiry-ordered/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/waqf-trust-in-possession-cannot-be-evicted-on-the-wrong-rule-number-order-xxi-rule-97-inquiry-ordered/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:15:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria held the burden had been wrongly fastened on the third-party objector and remanded the execution of an ex parte 2015 decree for a full inquiry.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A trial judge said a compromise decree had no evidentiary value, a High Court judge said the gift deed was never disputed, and the suit challenging it was on the file</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/compromise-decree-of-1990-ignored-by-two-courts-litigation-from-1959-family-settlement-closed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/compromise-decree-of-1990-ignored-by-two-courts-litigation-from-1959-family-settlement-closed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Sanjay Kumar and Sanjeev Sachdeva decreed a 2007 suit outright, holding both judgments below rested on fundamental errors, and noted that no respondent appeared despite a status quo order.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>₹14,131 crore has already been restored against a ₹6,203 crore loan, and the banks&#39; claim over the United Breweries shares cannot survive that</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/karnataka-hc/ubl-shares-released-from-kingfisher-recovery-personal-guarantee-is-not-a-charge-over-named-assets/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/karnataka-hc/ubl-shares-released-from-kingfisher-recovery-personal-guarantee-is-not-a-charge-over-named-assets/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:05:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices D.K. Singh and T.M. Nadaf set aside the DRT and DRAT orders and the Recovery Officer&#39;s attachment, holding a personal guarantee creates no proprietary security over unlisted assets and no security at all over jointly held shares.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Her five-year-old son was in the room and had burns on both hands, and the prosecution never once recorded what he saw</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/husband-acquitted-after-23-years-dying-declarations-inconsistent-and-the-child-eyewitness-never-examined/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/husband-acquitted-after-23-years-dying-declarations-inconsistent-and-the-child-eyewitness-never-examined/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:00:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja set aside a 2003 life sentence, holding the declarations did not present a consistent account and that a neighbour&#39;s unchallenged evidence placed the appellant outside the house.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>He telephoned the husband to come home, said he had found her hanging from the fan, and the forensic examination of the fan said otherwise</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/gujarat-hc/fsl-report-ruled-out-hanging-and-the-friend-who-reported-the-suicide-stays-convicted-of-murder/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/gujarat-hc/fsl-report-ruled-out-hanging-and-the-friend-who-reported-the-suicide-stays-convicted-of-murder/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:55:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Gita Gopi and L.S. Pirzada dismissed a 97-page appeal against conviction, holding that motive need not be separately proved where the accused&#39;s own conduct supplies it.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A ₹43.43 crore demand on Amul for not cross-charging its own head office, and not one finding of why that was fraud</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/gujarat-hc/section-74-cgst-demand-of-43-crore-on-amul-quashed-for-mechanical-invocation-of-suppression/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/gujarat-hc/section-74-cgst-demand-of-43-crore-on-amul-quashed-for-mechanical-invocation-of-suppression/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices A.S. Supehia and Vaibhavi D. Nanavati quashed the order in original, holding the exercise would have been revenue-neutral and that Section 74 cannot be a routine formula for bypassing normal limitation.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>An eleven-year-old sent out with ₹15 for cow dung cakes, a red bicycle left at the orchard, and a conviction that survives three hostile witnesses</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/calcutta-hc/conviction-upheld-on-eight-circumstances-and-four-lakh-victim-compensation-directed-in-seven-days/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/calcutta-hc/conviction-upheld-on-eight-circumstances-and-four-lakh-victim-compensation-directed-in-seven-days/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:45:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Rajasekhar Mantha and Anuj Singh dismissed the appeal, held the acquitted co-accused&#39;s case was distinct, and ordered the State to pay the parents ₹4,00,000 within seven days.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A memorandum of December 2001 is still being litigated, and the Court has had to decide first which of its own judges should hear it</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/calcutta-hc/fema-writ-petitions-belong-to-the-revenue-group-matters-released-from-the-roster/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/calcutta-hc/fema-writ-petitions-belong-to-the-revenue-group-matters-released-from-the-roster/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:40:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Krishna Rao held that foreign exchange falls within the Revenue and Tax Laws group under the Court&#39;s own classification rules, released three writ petitions, and extended interim protection to 3 December 2026.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Two digits were missing from the address on the postal receipt, and that is why a 2017 arbitral award is still open to objection</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/missing-premises-number-on-a-speed-post-receipt-means-section-34-limitation-never-started/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/missing-premises-number-on-a-speed-post-receipt-means-section-34-limitation-never-started/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Ajay Digpaul held the presumption of service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act cannot be divorced from proper addressing, and refused to disturb the trial court&#39;s finding under Article 227.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A sting operation in 2014, a trial that never started because of a jurisdiction fight the force itself won, and a dismissal without any trial at all</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/gauhati-hc/assam-rifles-dismissal-without-a-garc-trial-set-aside-limitation-was-never-shown-to-have-run-out/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/gauhati-hc/assam-rifles-dismissal-without-a-garc-trial-set-aside-limitation-was-never-shown-to-have-run-out/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Kardak Ete held that practical difficulties do not establish impracticability under Rule 20, and that the period during which the Meghalaya High Court&#39;s stay operated had not been reckoned with.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The decree says they married in April 2023 and separated in June of that year. She says the wedding was in April 2024</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/jharkhand-hc/mutual-consent-divorce-decree-set-aside-where-the-date-of-marriage-itself-was-in-dispute/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/jharkhand-hc/mutual-consent-divorce-decree-set-aside-where-the-date-of-marriage-itself-was-in-dispute/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Sujit Narayan Prasad and Sanjay Prasad held that even a consent decree is assailable where the consent is in question, and sent the case back to the Family Court for an inquiry into the date of marriage.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>She said she would live with her husband anywhere but that one house, and the Family Court looked only at the fact that she had left</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/jharkhand-hc/restitution-of-conjugal-rights-decree-perverse-where-the-wifes-reason-for-leaving-was-never-weighed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/jharkhand-hc/restitution-of-conjugal-rights-decree-perverse-where-the-wifes-reason-for-leaving-was-never-weighed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Sujit Narayan Prasad and Pradeep Kumar Srivastava set aside a decree of restitution of conjugal rights as perverse, holding that the test of reasonableness was never applied to her defence.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>He rented out his vehicle for ₹3.25 lakh and got back neither the rent nor the vehicle, and the High Court sent him to the Magistrate</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madhya-pradesh-hc/a-writ-is-not-the-route-to-an-fir-the-magistrate-is-and-the-statutory-architecture-is-complete/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madhya-pradesh-hc/a-writ-is-not-the-route-to-an-fir-the-magistrate-is-and-the-statutory-architecture-is-complete/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:15:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Pramod Kumar Agrawal declined a mandamus to register an FIR, setting out the layered remedies under the CrPC and the BNSS and holding that sanction operates at cognizance and not before it.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Ten farmers tried to attach a Tahsildar&#39;s computers and furniture to recover canal compensation, and the executing court dismissed them instead of finding the right debtor</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/andhra-pradesh-hc/enhanced-land-acquisition-compensation-unpaid-since-2008-execution-petitions-restored/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/andhra-pradesh-hc/enhanced-land-acquisition-compensation-unpaid-since-2008-execution-petitions-restored/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi set aside ten dismissal orders, holding that a reference court&#39;s award is a decree and that absence of a proper party does not justify dismissal without inquiry.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Fifty bottles were said to have been counted in a jungle, two were sent to the laboratory, and the tubes were never produced in court</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/nineteen-years-for-two-sample-bottles-excise-conviction-set-aside-illicit-origin-never-proved/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/nineteen-years-for-two-sample-bottles-excise-conviction-set-aside-illicit-origin-never-proved/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Rakesh Kainthla acquitted a man prosecuted since 2007, holding that the chemical examiner never said the liquor differed from licensed distillery spirit and that two bottles are within the permissible limit.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A friendly loan of ₹75,000, a cheque that bounced, and a challenge to the one thing that makes a compensation order bite</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/a-default-sentence-for-not-paying-compensation-under-section-357-3-is-lawful-cheque-conviction-upheld/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/a-default-sentence-for-not-paying-compensation-under-section-357-3-is-lawful-cheque-conviction-upheld/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Rakesh Kainthla dismissed a revision against concurrent convictions under Section 138, holding there is no infirmity in a sentence imposed in default of payment of compensation.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The Union gets its consumer appeal back after a 312-day delay, and pays ₹5,000 to the man who had to come to the High Court without a lawyer</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/orissa-hc/postal-departments-appeal-restored-but-the-senior-citizen-who-argued-in-person-gets-costs/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/orissa-hc/postal-departments-appeal-restored-but-the-senior-citizen-who-argued-in-person-gets-costs/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:55:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice A.K. Mohapatra held the State Commission had dismissed the condonation application mechanically, but confined his intervention to the decision-making process and attached a condition to the relief.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Interim compensation for a road-accident victim — without proving anyone&#39;s fault</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/everyday-law/no-fault-liability-section-140/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/everyday-law/no-fault-liability-section-140/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 03:35:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Editorial Desk</dc:creator>
    <description></description>
    <category>Everyday Law</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Kelsen Without Kelsenians: A Profile of Pure Theory&#39;s Strange Indian Career</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/the-republic/kelsen-without-kelsenians/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/the-republic/kelsen-without-kelsenians/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 03:00:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ramesh Singh</dc:creator>
    <description></description>
    <category>The Republic</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The Speaker could accept the resignations while disqualification petitions were pending, but he now has two months to decide them</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/speaker-can-accept-resignations-while-disqualification-pending-two-month-mandamus/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/speaker-can-accept-resignations-while-disqualification-pending-two-month-mandamus/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:55:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan upheld the acceptance of five MLAs&#39; resignations and issued a time-bound mandamus on the Tenth Schedule proceedings.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Four men shot dead in 1996, thirteen convicted in 2023, and every conviction now set aside over the investigation</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/patna-hc/four-killed-in-1996-thirteen-convicted-in-2023-all-acquitted-dgp-committee-ordered/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/patna-hc/four-killed-in-1996-thirteen-convicted-in-2023-all-acquitted-dgp-committee-ordered/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:50:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Rajeev Ranjan Prasad and Kumar Manish allowed five appeals, ordered a three-member police committee on the investigating officer, and asked the Home Department to report in a month.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A GST audit said to be out of time does not get a writ, but the taxpayer gets a month to appeal</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/patna-hc/gst-audit-report-challenge-appealable-order-writ-declined-one-month-to-appeal/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/patna-hc/gst-audit-report-challenge-appealable-order-writ-declined-one-month-to-appeal/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Rajeev Ranjan Prasad and Sunil Dutta Mishra found no jurisdictional error and declined Article 226 relief against an appealable order, preserving the appeal.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Having a daughter the same age proves nothing, and a six-year-old&#39;s delayed disclosure was natural</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/section-354-conviction-upheld-child-victim-natural-conduct-revision-dismissed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/section-354-conviction-upheld-child-victim-natural-conduct-revision-dismissed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Rakesh Kainthla dismissed a revision pending since 2014, upholding a conviction under Section 354 IPC and a sentence of one year&#39;s simple imprisonment.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A year in jail for a road death is not excessive, and Section 304-A is not a candidate for probation</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/section-304a-one-year-sentence-upheld-probation-not-available-road-death/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/section-304a-one-year-sentence-upheld-probation-not-available-road-death/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Rakesh Kainthla dismissed a revision from 2014, upholding convictions from a 2009 accident at Nahan and declining to reduce the sentence.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Once the liability is admitted, paucity of funds is no answer, and a writ for contractual dues will be entertained</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/admitted-contractual-dues-paucity-of-funds-no-defence-article-226-writ-allowed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/admitted-contractual-dues-paucity-of-funds-no-defence-article-226-writ-allowed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Prakash Padia and Indrajeet Shukla allowed a writ petition for admitted dues, drawing the line between a petition being maintainable and a court choosing to entertain it.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A complaint against police officers needed the Section 175(4) safeguards, and the order that skipped them is gone</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/section-175-4-bnss-complaint-against-police-order-set-aside-non-speaking/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/section-175-4-bnss-complaint-against-police-order-set-aside-non-speaking/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Santosh Rai set aside a Special Judge&#39;s order under Section 173(4) of the BNSS, holding it non-speaking and made without the inquiry the statute requires.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A society was denied its land because the developer was in insolvency and wanted two more floors; both grounds fail</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/bombay-hc/deemed-conveyance-cannot-be-refused-because-the-developer-is-in-insolvency/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/bombay-hc/deemed-conveyance-cannot-be-refused-because-the-developer-is-in-insolvency/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Sandeep V. Marne set aside the Competent Authority&#39;s refusal and remanded the application with a direction to issue the deemed conveyance certificate.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The clock under Section 34 never started, because the arbitrator never delivered a signed award to the party</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/bombay-hc/limitation-under-section-34-runs-only-from-delivery-of-signed-award-to-the-party/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/bombay-hc/limitation-under-section-34-runs-only-from-delivery-of-signed-award-to-the-party/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice N.J. Jamadar held that a copy reaching someone on behalf of the advocate does not discharge the statutory obligation, and declared the petition not time-barred.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>An award over the Commonwealth Games athletic track survives eleven years of challenge under Section 34</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/commonwealth-games-athletic-track-award-upheld-section-34-challenge-dismissed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/commonwealth-games-athletic-track-award-upheld-section-34-challenge-dismissed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Om Prakash Shukla rejected the CPWD&#39;s objections to the arbitrator&#39;s impartiality, to the merits of three claims, and to the scope of the reference.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A suggestion of tutoring is not proof of it, and a six-year-old&#39;s consistent account carried the conviction</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/child-witness-testimony-upheld-pocso-conviction-tutoring-not-established/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/child-witness-testimony-upheld-pocso-conviction-tutoring-not-established/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Madhu Jain dismissed an appeal under Section 415(2) of the BNSS, setting out when a child witness can be the sole basis of a conviction.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Assignment is a government act, not a sale, so Rule 7(2) is no answer to an Ooty building permit on patta land</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/ooty-building-permit-assignment-is-not-conveyance-rule-7-2-no-bar/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/ooty-building-permit-assignment-is-not-conveyance-rule-7-2-no-bar/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:00:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice V. Lakshminarayanan issued a mandamus to the Udhagamandalam Municipality, holding the applicant need not wait to be refused before coming to court.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>He was offered a third choice the statute does not contain, and the consent memo named the offence before anyone had searched him</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/himachal-pradesh-high-court-ndps-section-50-third-option-search-acquittal-charas/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/himachal-pradesh-hc/himachal-pradesh-high-court-ndps-section-50-third-option-search-acquittal-charas/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:55:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Fifteen years after conviction, the Himachal Pradesh High Court acquits on Section 50 of the NDPS Act — a recovery made in breach of it cannot be relied on at all.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Both last-seen witnesses turned hostile and denied their own statements. The State asked the High Court to convict anyway</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/karnataka-hc/karnataka-high-court-state-appeal-against-acquittal-dismissed-last-seen-witnesses-hostile/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/karnataka-hc/karnataka-high-court-state-appeal-against-acquittal-dismissed-last-seen-witnesses-hostile/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:50:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>A hotel ledger, a set of recoveries and a father who admitted he never saw the knives. The Karnataka High Court finds no error in an acquittal in a murder case built on circumstances.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>One arbitration clause named Delhi and Goa, and the Delhi High Court had no business appointing the arbitrator</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/arbitration-clause-named-delhi-and-goa-juridical-seat-held-to-be-goa/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/arbitration-clause-named-delhi-and-goa-juridical-seat-held-to-be-goa/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:45:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Manoj Misra and Vijay Bishnoi held the juridical seat was Goa on a holistic reading of the franchise agreement, and set aside the Section 11(6) appointment.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A compromise decree he was never party to turned up in the Tahsildar&#39;s records, and that is due diligence enough to amend</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/order-vi-rule-17-amendment-allowed-compromise-decree-found-in-tahsildar-records/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/order-vi-rule-17-amendment-allowed-compromise-decree-found-in-tahsildar-records/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices B.V. Nagarathna and R. Mahadevan allowed an amendment the trial court and the Orissa High Court had refused, subject to costs of Rs 25,000.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Railways threw out a bid for not producing the original of a payment made online, and the Court called it an impossibility</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/bid-rejected-for-original-of-an-electronic-payment-perversity-contract-awarded/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/bid-rejected-for-original-of-an-electronic-payment-perversity-contract-awarded/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran set aside the rejection as perverse and directed that the railway contract be awarded to the bidder who was shut out.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Two non-signatories whose partnership depends on the disputed retirement deed are veritable parties to the arbitration</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/non-signatories-held-veritable-parties-to-arbitration-worli-partnership-asset/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/non-signatories-held-veritable-parties-to-arbitration-worli-partnership-asset/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:30:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran modified a Section 11 order, holding on a prima facie view that the outcome would substantially affect the absent parties&#39; rights.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A lecturer out of work since 1999 cannot be absorbed into an aided post, so the Court used Article 142 and gave him Rs 10 lakh</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/lecturer-out-of-work-since-1999-article-142-rs-10-lakh-no-absorption/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/lecturer-out-of-work-since-1999-article-142-rs-10-lakh-no-absorption/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu set aside the direction to absorb him, held the State partly to blame for its own silence, and moulded the relief in money.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The disability pension judgment of February cannot be read as entitling every ex-serviceman to arrears</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/girish-kumar-disability-pension-judgment-clarified-not-every-case/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/girish-kumar-disability-pension-judgment-clarified-not-every-case/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:20:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe clarified their own common judgment, which the Union said was being applied to 49 Air Force and Army cases it never covered.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Living together without marriage — what the law says in India</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/everyday-law/live-in-relationship-status-india/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/everyday-law/live-in-relationship-status-india/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 03:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Editorial Desk</dc:creator>
    <description></description>
    <category>Everyday Law</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Online shopping fraud — your two-track remedy</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/everyday-law/online-shopping-fraud/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/everyday-law/online-shopping-fraud/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 03:41:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Editorial Desk</dc:creator>
    <description></description>
    <category>Everyday Law</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>An officer who burnt a piece of the seizure and called it charas did not prove what the substance was</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/ndps-charas-identified-by-burning-not-proof-two-acquitted-after-twenty-two-years/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/ndps-charas-identified-by-burning-not-proof-two-acquitted-after-twenty-two-years/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Sandeep Mehta and Manmohan acquitted two men sentenced to eight and ten years under the NDPS Act, holding the identity of the contraband was never established.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Hindi translators cannot claim promotion under the rules that existed when the vacancies arose</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/rajbhasha-adhikari-promotion-old-rules-no-vested-right-raj-kumar-applied/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/rajbhasha-adhikari-promotion-old-rules-no-vested-right-raj-kumar-applied/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Ujjal Bhuyan set aside High Court orders directing BSNL to consider officiating Rajbhasha Adhikaris under the pre-2005 promotion rules.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>An unproved allegation about a father&#39;s habits was not enough to undo a sale, and the trial court&#39;s decree is restored</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/partition-suit-alienation-legal-necessity-trial-court-decree-restored/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/partition-suit-alienation-legal-necessity-trial-court-decree-restored/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Augustine George Masih and Sandeep Mehta set aside a Karnataka High Court decree in a partition suit, holding the first appellate court ignored the evidence on record.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A claimant who lives in Chittoor and was injured in Tirupati cannot file his claim in Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/motor-accident-claim-territorial-jurisdiction-section-166-chennai-to-chittoor/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/motor-accident-claim-territorial-jurisdiction-section-166-chennai-to-chittoor/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Atul S. Chandurkar upheld the transfer of a motor accident claim, holding Section 166(2) cannot be read beyond its plain language.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The 53 kg stone said to have killed the man was never recovered and never shown to the doctor</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/laterite-stone-never-recovered-never-shown-to-doctor-murder-convictions-set-aside/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/laterite-stone-never-recovered-never-shown-to-doctor-murder-convictions-set-aside/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:01:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices M.M. Sundresh and Prasanna B. Varale set aside murder convictions from 2004, holding the chain of circumstances had substantial gaps and two views were possible.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>He reached the bodies within two hours and said nothing about two men with sticks looking for them</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/witness-who-said-nothing-that-night-acquittal-affirmed-himachal-double-murder/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/witness-who-said-nothing-that-night-acquittal-affirmed-himachal-double-murder/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:55:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Manoj Misra and Vijay Bishnoi dismissed the State&#39;s appeal, holding recoveries made three days after arrest looked stage-managed and the key witness was untrustworthy.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Even with both sides consenting, a Section 37 appeal cannot be handed to the arbitral tribunal as a Section 17 application</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/section-37-appeal-cannot-be-remitted-to-arbitral-tribunal-as-section-17-application/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/section-37-appeal-cannot-be-remitted-to-arbitral-tribunal-as-section-17-application/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:50:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Aravind Kumar and Prasanna B. Varale set aside that part of a High Court order, holding appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 belongs exclusively to the Court.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The pages said to be too blurred to answer were read in court, and found perfectly legible</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/kerala-hc/kaapa-detention-upheld-illegible-documents-claim-rejected-on-perusal/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/kerala-hc/kaapa-detention-upheld-illegible-documents-claim-rejected-on-perusal/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. upheld a KAAPA detention, rejecting the claim that illegible documents had denied the detenu an effective representation.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A 1980 sauda receipt, a suit dismissed in 2002, and a first appeal decided in 2026 in the buyer&#39;s favour</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madhya-pradesh-hc/specific-performance-1980-sauda-receipt-first-appeal-allowed-after-forty-six-years/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madhya-pradesh-hc/specific-performance-1980-sauda-receipt-first-appeal-allowed-after-forty-six-years/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:40:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt allowed a first appeal under Section 96, holding the buyer was ready and willing and that time was not of the essence under an informal receipt.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Two of the three cases were from outside the District Magistrate&#39;s own district, and the detention order never explained why that mattered</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/andhra-pradesh-hc/goonda-detention-quashed-grounds-outside-district-bail-conditions-not-considered/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/andhra-pradesh-hc/goonda-detention-quashed-grounds-outside-district-bail-conditions-not-considered/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Ravi Nath Tilhari and Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi quashed a Goondas Act detention, holding a single vicious ground is enough to vitiate the order.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Three revenue orders refusing to mutate a 2010 sale deed are set aside, and so is a fourth passed behind the buyers&#39; backs</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madhya-pradesh-hc/mutation-refused-three-revenue-orders-set-aside-article-227-bhoomiswami/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madhya-pradesh-hc/mutation-refused-three-revenue-orders-set-aside-article-227-bhoomiswami/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt held the Tehsildar, Sub Divisional Officer and Additional Commissioner were wrong that permission was needed, and quashed an ex parte consequential order too.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The delay in issuing the detention order was never explained, and that alone undid it</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/kerala-hc/pitndps-detention-set-aside-inordinate-delay-bail-cancellation-no-substitute/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/kerala-hc/pitndps-detention-set-aside-inordinate-delay-bail-cancellation-no-substitute/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Anil K. Narendran and Muralee Krishna S. set aside a PITNDPS Act detention for inordinate delay, while rejecting the argument that bail cancellation had to be tried first.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Twelve years after his selection was cancelled, a constable gets the job back with seniority but no arrears</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/andhra-pradesh-hc/constable-selection-restored-non-disclosure-no-one-size-fits-all-formula/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/andhra-pradesh-hc/constable-selection-restored-non-disclosure-no-one-size-fits-all-formula/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:21:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice K. Sreenivasa Reddy set aside the cancellation of a police constable&#39;s selection, holding non-disclosure of a criminal case cannot be met with a rigid formula.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Interest on a bank guarantee that was never encashed is cut out of the award, and the rest of it stands</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/chhattisgarh-hc/secl-arbitration-award-severed-pendente-lite-interest-bank-guarantee-set-aside/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/chhattisgarh-hc/secl-arbitration-award-severed-pendente-lite-interest-bank-guarantee-set-aside/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Parth Prateem Sahu and Sachin Singh Rajput severed the arbitral award, setting aside pendente lite interest on security deposit guarantees while upholding post-award interest.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A Christian&#39;s Will is still revoked by his marriage, and a Hindu&#39;s is not, and that difference survives Article 14</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/kerala-hc/section-69-indian-succession-act-marriage-revokes-will-christians-upheld/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/kerala-hc/section-69-indian-succession-act-marriage-revokes-will-christians-upheld/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Sathish Ninan and P. Krishna Kumar answered a suo motu reference by upholding Section 69 of the Indian Succession Act and rejecting the claim that it conflicts with Section 20.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Madhya Pradesh&#39;s increase of OBC reservation from 14 to 27 per cent is struck down, and the 1983 report it rested on is held too old to carry it</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madhya-pradesh-hc/madhya-pradesh-obc-reservation-27-percent-amendment-act-2019-struck-down/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madhya-pradesh-hc/madhya-pradesh-obc-reservation-27-percent-amendment-act-2019-struck-down/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Anand Pathak and Vinay Saraf held OBCs are adequately represented under Article 16(4), struck down the 2019 Amendment Act, and saved appointments made up to 29 September 2022.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Once the Settlement Commission has spoken, the Assessing Officer cannot reopen the same years</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/settlement-commission-finality-assessing-officer-cannot-reopen-section-245d/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/settlement-commission-finality-assessing-officer-cannot-reopen-section-245d/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria dismissed the Revenue&#39;s appeal, holding that a settlement order is revisited only through Section 245D(6) and not by a fresh reassessment notice.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Two accomplices propping each other up is not corroboration, and a diary put the officer on a train</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/rpf-security-commissioner-acquitted-approver-corroboration-diary-entry/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/rpf-security-commissioner-acquitted-approver-corroboration-diary-entry/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:55:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Dipankar Datta and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh acquitted a Railway Protection Force officer in both CBI prosecutions, holding approver evidence needed corroboration from someone outside the transaction.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The POCSO presumption shifts the onus, it does not tilt how a court reads the evidence</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/pocso-presumption-sections-29-30-cannot-tilt-appreciation-of-evidence-acquittal/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/pocso-presumption-sections-29-30-cannot-tilt-appreciation-of-evidence-acquittal/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and N.V. Anjaria set aside a ten-year sentence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, holding the presumption falls away once the prosecution case is found empty.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A truck taken away in the night cost the financier Rs 10 lakh, and the RBI was told its circulars exist only on paper</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/truck-repossessed-without-notice-rs-10-lakh-compensation-rbi-directed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/truck-repossessed-without-notice-rs-10-lakh-compensation-rbi-directed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe held the repossession and sale violated Articles 14 and 21, ordered compensation and costs, and directed the RBI to secure compliance.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Making industrial methanol bitter and blue was no answer to a hooch tragedy, and the rules fell under Articles 14 and 19</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/maharashtra-poisons-rules-methanol-bitterant-colourant-struck-down-articles-14-19/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/maharashtra-poisons-rules-methanol-bitterant-colourant-struck-down-articles-14-19/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:41:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran struck down Rules 18A and 18B of the Maharashtra Poisons Rules and sent fifteen regulatory suggestions to every High Court and Chief Secretary.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A deposit is not a payment: the award-debtor pays interest until the money actually reaches the creditor</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/deposit-is-not-payment-arbitral-award-interest-law-commission-reference/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/deposit-is-not-payment-arbitral-award-interest-law-commission-reference/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe upheld interest running until release of a conditional deposit, and asked the Law Commission to examine how courts hold such money.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A Section 92 suit gets no interim protection before leave, but a court may grant leave without notice when it is urgent</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/section-92-cpc-no-interim-orders-before-leave-high-court-conflict-settled/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/section-92-cpc-no-interim-orders-before-leave-high-court-conflict-settled/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Manoj Misra and Manmohan resolved a conflict among six High Courts, holding a civil court cannot pass preservatory orders while a leave application under Section 92 is pending.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The Union could not show how the 2008 Entitlement Rules were made, and its appeals against disabled soldiers failed</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/union-appeals-disabled-soldiers-entitlement-rules-2008-suspect-legality/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/supreme-court/union-appeals-disabled-soldiers-entitlement-rules-2008-suspect-legality/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:25:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe held that the 2008 Entitlement Rules substantially reproduce the 1982 scheme, and dismissed a batch of 271 appeals on delay and on merits.</description>
    <category>Supreme Court</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Three things a magistrate must do before ordering an investigation &amp;mdash; and an order that did none of them</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/section-175-3-bnss-three-requirements-order-directing-investigation-set-aside-guidelines/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/section-175-3-bnss-three-requirements-order-directing-investigation-set-aside-guidelines/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:21:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Santosh Rai sets aside an order directing investigation into a night raid alleged by two Scheduled Caste women, holding that Section 175(3) of the BNSS imposes three distinct duties and that the omission &quot;goes to the very exercise of jurisdiction&quot; — and circulates the judgment to every judicial officer in the State.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>&amp;ldquo;Civil in nature&amp;rdquo; is not a reason to refuse an FIR &amp;mdash; a magistrate who held a mini trial exceeded his jurisdiction</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/magistrate-cannot-conduct-mini-trial-refuse-fir-on-ground-dispute-is-civil-chengalpattu/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/magistrate-cannot-conduct-mini-trial-refuse-fir-on-ground-dispute-is-civil-chengalpattu/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:16:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Shamim Ahmed sets aside an order of the Judicial Magistrate II, Chengalpattu and remands the matter with a direction to order registration of an FIR and a proper investigation, to be completed within eight weeks.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Four questions a dowry death prosecution has to answer &amp;mdash; and a case that answered none of them</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/patna-hc/dowry-death-acquittal-what-was-the-last-demand-who-made-it-and-when-section-304b/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/patna-hc/dowry-death-acquittal-what-was-the-last-demand-who-made-it-and-when-section-304b/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha acquits a husband&#39;s elderly parents and a third relative convicted under Section 304-B, holding that the evidence does not identify the last demand, who made it, when it was made, or how it stayed connected to the death.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Two severed hands, eight altered records, and a death sentence that cannot stand</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/death-reference-answered-in-negative-altered-inquest-records-dgp-inquiry-ordered/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/death-reference-answered-in-negative-altered-inquest-records-dgp-inquiry-ordered/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Atul Sreedharan and Achal Sachdev answer a capital reference in the negative and commute two death sentences to life — then order the Director General of Police to inquire into the officers who prepared the inquests, with a report to the Registrar General within three months.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ANNAPOORNA against ANNAPURNA: an injunction is made absolute, and an undertaking shapes its edges</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/annapoorna-annapurna-interim-injunction-made-absolute-snacks-namkeens-blended-spices/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/annapoorna-annapurna-interim-injunction-made-absolute-snacks-namkeens-blended-spices/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:01:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice A. D. Maria Clete makes an interim injunction absolute till disposal of the suit, refuses to carve snacks and namkeens out of it, and confines the passing-off limb to blended spices on the defendant&#39;s own undertaking.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Age sixty-one and a position of trust are not mitigation &amp;mdash; a school correspondent&#39;s conviction is confirmed</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/school-correspondent-conviction-confirmed-sexual-assault-wrongful-confinement-locked-room/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/madras-hc/school-correspondent-conviction-confirmed-sexual-assault-wrongful-confinement-locked-room/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice G. Arul Murugan dismisses the appeal of a man convicted of sexually assaulting a ten-year-old child at the school he ran, and holds that locking the room established wrongful confinement under Section 342 of the Penal Code.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The notice said subletting and so did the order &amp;mdash; an industrial plot eviction survives Article 227</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/bombay-hc/midc-eviction-upheld-illegal-subletting-order-did-not-travel-beyond-show-cause-notice/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/bombay-hc/midc-eviction-upheld-illegal-subletting-order-did-not-travel-beyond-show-cause-notice/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:51:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Aarti Sathe declines to interfere with an eviction from a Wagle Industrial Estate plot, distinguishing a tax case in which the authorities had changed grounds between the show cause notice and the final order.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>You cannot sue for partition while leaving the Will that defeats you unchallenged</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/partition-suit-rejected-order-vii-rule-11-will-left-unchallenged-limitation-expired/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/delhi-hc/partition-suit-rejected-order-vii-rule-11-will-left-unchallenged-limitation-expired/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justice Neena Bansal Krishna upholds the rejection of a partition suit under Order VII Rule 11, holding that a plaintiff who has known of the Wills since 2014 needed a declaration and the limitation for one had long expired.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>A girl who vanished in 2002, a life sentence in 2013, and an acquittal in 2026</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/findings-perverse-circumstantial-chain-incomplete-acquittal-after-twenty-four-years/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/allahabad-hc/findings-perverse-circumstantial-chain-incomplete-acquittal-after-twenty-four-years/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>Justices Abdul Moin and Pramod Kumar Srivastava hold the circumstances relied on by the prosecution do not form a complete chain, call the trial court&#39;s findings perverse, and order the release of a man who has been in jail throughout.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>The divorce stands, but it comes with Rs 20 lakh &amp;mdash; a wife with no other income gets permanent alimony</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/jharkhand-hc/divorce-decree-affirmed-permanent-alimony-of-rs-20-lakh-in-four-instalments-jamshedpur/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/high-courts/jharkhand-hc/divorce-decree-affirmed-permanent-alimony-of-rs-20-lakh-in-four-instalments-jamshedpur/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:36:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HC Desk</dc:creator>
    <description>A Division Bench of Justices Sujit Narayan Prasad and Sanjay Prasad affirms a decree dissolving a 2003 marriage and modifies it by awarding a lump sum of Rs 20,00,000, payable in four equal instalments within twelve months.</description>
    <category>High Courts</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>