Section 175(3) BNSS Application Format to Magistrate for FIR
Section 175(3), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, read with Section 173(4) BNSS [old Sections 156(3) and 154(3) CrPC]
Sample format, not legal advice. This is a sample format for general information. It is not legal advice and does not create a lawyer–client relationship. Facts, court practice, court fees and stamp duty differ by state and by case. Check the current law and your local court rules, or speak to an advocate, before you file, send or sign it.
A Section 175(3) application asks the Magistrate to order the police to investigate a cognizable offence — in practice, to register an FIR and investigate — when the police have refused to act. It is filed by the person who first went to the SHO and then to the Superintendent of Police, and got no FIR.
Section 175(3) BNSS (old Section 156(3) CrPC) codifies the safeguards laid down in Priyanka Srivastava v. State of U.P. (2015). As the Supreme Court explained in Om Prakash Ambadkar v. State of Maharashtra (2025), the Magistrate must consider the application supported by an affidavit, together with the complaint made to the SP under Section 173(4), may make such inquiry as he thinks necessary, and must consider the police officer's submissions. This differs from a private complaint under Section 223 BNSS, where the Magistrate takes cognizance and records evidence himself instead of sending the case to the police.
- Filed before
- Judicial Magistrate First Class or Chief Judicial / Metropolitan Magistrate having jurisdiction over the place of offence
- Filed by
- The complainant who approached the SHO and the SP
- Pre-condition
- Complaint to SHO under Section 173(1) and to SP under Section 173(4) BNSS, with proof
- Supporting affidavit
- Required — Priyanka Srivastava (2015); now built into Section 175(3)
- Time limit
- None fixed; file soon after the SP fails to act
- Court fee
- Nominal; set by state court-fee rules
When to use this format
- The SHO refused or failed to register an FIR on your written complaint about a cognizable offence.
- You then sent the complaint to the Superintendent of Police under Section 173(4) BNSS and no FIR followed.
- The facts need police investigation — tracing the accused, recovering property, collecting records — which you cannot do yourself.
- The accused is a public servant and the act relates to official duty — Section 175(4) BNSS adds a report from the superior officer before any order.
- If you have not yet written to the police, start with the police complaint to SHO.
Application under Section 175(3) BNSS with supporting affidavit
Replace everything in [square brackets] with your own details. Delete lines that do not apply.
IN THE COURT OF THE [CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE / JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS / METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE], [PLACE], [DISTRICT], [STATE] Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. ______ of [YEAR] IN THE MATTER OF: [FULL NAME OF APPLICANT] S/o / D/o / W/o [FATHER'S OR SPOUSE'S NAME] Aged about [AGE] years R/o [FULL ADDRESS] Mobile: [MOBILE NUMBER] ... Applicant / Complainant Versus 1. [NAME OF PROPOSED ACCUSED NO. 1] S/o / D/o / W/o [NAME] R/o [ADDRESS] 2. [NAME OF PROPOSED ACCUSED NO. 2, IF ANY] R/o [ADDRESS] ... Proposed Accused Police Station: [NAME OF POLICE STATION], District [DISTRICT] APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 175(3) OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 FOR A DIRECTION TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF POLICE STATION [NAME] TO REGISTER AN FIR AND INVESTIGATE MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the applicant is a resident of the address given above. The offence described below was committed at [PLACE], within the local limits of Police Station [NAME] and within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court. 2. That [STATE THE FACTS IN THE ORDER THEY HAPPENED — dates, amounts, documents, and the specific role of each proposed accused]. 3. That the above facts disclose the commission of cognizable offences punishable under Sections [SECTIONS, e.g. 318(4), 316(2), 351(2), 3(5) OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 AND/OR SECTIONS OF ANY OTHER ACT]. [IF THE OFFENCE WAS BEFORE 1 JULY 2024, CITE THE CORRESPONDING IPC SECTIONS.] 4. That on [DATE], the applicant gave a written complaint to the Station House Officer, Police Station [NAME], under Section 173(1) of the Sanhita. The complaint was received [VIDE DIARY / GD NO. [NUMBER] / BY POST, DELIVERED ON [DATE]]. A copy, with proof of delivery, is annexed as Annexure A-1. [STATE WHAT HAPPENED: no FIR was registered / the SHO refused orally on [DATE] / the applicant was told to settle the matter]. 5. That on [DATE], the applicant sent the substance of the information in writing, by post, to the Superintendent of Police, [DISTRICT], under Section 173(4) of the Sanhita. It was delivered on [DATE]. A copy, with postal receipt and tracking report, is annexed as Annexure A-2. [STATE: no action was taken till date / the SP forwarded it to the same police station but no FIR was registered / reply dated [DATE] is annexed as Annexure A-3]. 6. That despite the above, no FIR has been registered, though the information plainly discloses cognizable offences. The applicant has thus availed the remedies under Section 173 of the Sanhita and is constrained to approach this Hon'ble Court. 7. That police investigation is necessary because [STATE WHY — e.g. the accused's identity and bank accounts need to be traced / the stolen property must be recovered / the documents are in the custody of the accused or third parties]. 8. That [THE PROPOSED ACCUSED IS NOT A PUBLIC SERVANT] [OR: proposed accused no. [NUMBER] is a public servant, and the applicant submits that the act complained of [DID NOT ARISE / AROSE] in the course of official duty; the applicant requests that the procedure under Section 175(4) of the Sanhita be followed, if applicable]. 9. That the applicant has not filed any other application or complaint on the same facts before any court, except [DETAILS, IF ANY]. 10. That this application is supported by the affidavit of the applicant. PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (a) call for a report or submissions from the Station House Officer, Police Station [NAME], as provided in Section 175(3) of the Sanhita; (b) direct the officer in charge of Police Station [NAME] to register an FIR on the applicant's complaint dated [DATE] and to investigate the case in accordance with law; and (c) pass any other order that this Hon'ble Court considers just and proper. Applicant / Complainant Through Counsel [ADVOCATE'S NAME] Advocate, Enrolment No. [ENROLMENT NUMBER] [CHAMBER ADDRESS] [MOBILE NUMBER] | [EMAIL] Place: [PLACE] Date: [DATE] LIST OF ANNEXURES Annexure A-1: Copy of complaint to SHO dated [DATE], with receiving or proof of delivery Annexure A-2: Copy of complaint to Superintendent of Police dated [DATE], with postal receipt and tracking report Annexure A-3: Reply of the police, if any Annexure A-4 onwards: [SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS — agreements, bank statements, messages, photographs, medical papers] AFFIDAVIT I, [FULL NAME OF APPLICANT], S/o / D/o / W/o [NAME], aged about [AGE] years, R/o [FULL ADDRESS], do solemnly affirm and state as under: 1. That I am the applicant in the accompanying application under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and I am fully acquainted with the facts of the case. 2. That the contents of paragraphs 1 to 10 of the accompanying application have been drafted on my instructions and are true and correct to my knowledge. 3. That I gave a written complaint to the SHO, Police Station [NAME], on [DATE], and sent the substance of the information to the Superintendent of Police, [DISTRICT], on [DATE], and no FIR has been registered. 4. That the annexures are true copies of their originals. 5. That I understand that making a false statement in this affidavit is a punishable offence. DEPONENT VERIFICATION Verified at [PLACE] on [DATE] that the contents of paragraphs 1 to 5 of this affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge, no part of it is false, and nothing material has been concealed. DEPONENT [SWORN BEFORE THE OATH COMMISSIONER / NOTARY]
How to fill it in
- Complete the police steps firstYou need proof of a written complaint to the SHO and a written complaint to the SP under Section 173(4) BNSS. Without the SP step, the application is likely to be dismissed at the threshold.
- Choose the courtFile before the Magistrate empowered under Section 210 BNSS to take cognizance, for the area where the offence took place. In most districts this means the Judicial Magistrate First Class or the Chief Judicial Magistrate's court, as per the court's distribution of work.
- Show every ingredient of the offenceIn paragraphs 2 and 3, link each fact to the offence. For cheating, for example, show the deception at the start, the inducement and the delivery of money or property.
- Explain why the police must investigateParagraph 7 matters: Magistrates often prefer to treat the application as a private complaint if the evidence is already with you. State what only the police can collect.
- Swear the affidavitSign the affidavit before the oath commissioner or notary. A false affidavit exposes you to prosecution, which is exactly why the courts insist on it.
- Attach postal proofAttach postal receipts and the online tracking report for the SP complaint, and the receiving or GD number for the SHO complaint.
- Attend the hearingThe court may call for a police report and hear you. If the Magistrate is satisfied, a direction goes to the SHO; if not, the Magistrate may treat it as a complaint under Section 223 BNSS and record your statement.
Documents to attach
- Copy of the written complaint to the SHO, with receiving or proof of delivery
- Copy of the complaint to the Superintendent of Police under Section 173(4) BNSS, with postal receipt and tracking report
- Any reply from the police
- Supporting affidavit of the applicant
- Documents supporting the allegations (agreements, bank statements, messages, photographs, medical papers)
- Identity proof of the applicant
- Vakalatnama, if filed through an advocate
What the Magistrate may do
The Magistrate may (i) direct the police to register an FIR and investigate; (ii) call for a report or submissions from the police first; or (iii) decline to send the matter to the police and instead treat it as a private complaint, recording the complainant's statement under Section 223 BNSS. The order is discretionary, so a well-documented application improves the chances.
Common mistakes
- Skipping the complaint to the Superintendent of Police under Section 173(4) BNSS.
- Filing without a supporting affidavit.
- Giving a vague story without dates, amounts or the role of each accused.
- Using this route for a purely civil dispute, such as breach of contract without dishonest intention at the start.
- Not attaching postal receipts and tracking reports as proof of delivery.
- Hiding an earlier complaint or case on the same facts.
Frequently asked questions
Is a complaint to the SP mandatory before a Section 175(3) application?
Why is an affidavit required?
How long should I wait for the SP to act?
Can the Magistrate refuse to order an FIR?
What if the accused is a public servant?
Reminder: This is a sample format for general information. It is not legal advice and does not create a lawyer–client relationship. Facts, court practice, court fees and stamp duty differ by state and by case. Check the current law and your local court rules, or speak to an advocate, before you file, send or sign it. Spotted an error? Tell us.