Latest Jammu Kashmir Ladakh Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court set aside a preventive detention order under the PITNDPS Act, holding that the detaining authority failed to explain why prior security proceedings under Section 129 BNSS were insufficient.
Justice Sanjay Dhar restored a suit over land at Nandpora Nigeen, Srinagar, finding that whether a private partition occurred after a 1971 arbitral award is a question of fact requiring trial.
Justice Sanjay Dhar admitted Mohammad Iqbal Wani to bail in a Rs 55.80 lakh wild garlic fraud, finding prima facie merit in his challenge to the organised crime charge under Section 111 BNS.
The J&K High Court held that a pre-emption suit filed under the J&K Right to Prior Purchase Act could not survive once the legislature repealed that Act before a decree was passed.
The High Court of J&K and Ladakh held that once a criminal charge sheet is dismissed and no assessed loss exists, a public sector corporation cannot withhold a retired employee's terminal benefits.
The Srinagar Bench held that a father's death after superannuation does not entitle his son to compassionate appointment, and consolidated-basis engagement carries no right to regularisation or deployment.
Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal held that a reasoned Section 143-A order cannot be set aside merely because the accused disputes the trial court's conclusions on relevant factors.
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court dismissed a writ petition by a PEG Scheme godown operator challenging FCI penalty recoveries for delayed black-topping of internal roads, holding the firm estopped by its own undertakings.
Justice M. A. Chowdhary dismissed bail and a revision petition filed by a Kupwara man facing repeated sexual assault charges, holding that a post-charge compromise carries no weight in Section 376 IPC matters.
Justice Sanjay Dhar held that an evasive denial cannot substitute a clear admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC when the defendant has taken a categorical stand on the disputed fact.
The Division Bench found that an MD graduate's shifting narratives about a University of Kashmir Gold Medal, combined with a nine-year delay in filing, fatally undermined his writ petition.
The High Court held that a Sub-Registrar must either register or refuse a document; seeking clarifications from superior authorities and advising parties to wait is outside the Registration Act, 1908.
A Division Bench of the J&K and Ladakh High Court dismissed a landowner's appeal seeking compensation for land rendered unusable by a 220 KV transmission line, holding that aerial right of way belongs to the State.
The J&K and Ladakh High Court dismissed a former Congress leader's plea to exchange proprietary land for encroached Kahcharaie land, holding that the 2020 amendment to Section 133(2) of the Land Revenue Act removed that power entirely.
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court upholds notifications directing all affiliated private schools to adopt Board-published textbooks for Classes VI to VIII, dismissing a trust's challenge.
The Srinagar bench found cumulative allegations of humiliation, rejection and indifference sufficient to frame a Section 306 IPC charge, while quashing proceedings against the grandfather for want of specific incriminating material.
Dismissing a school's repeated challenge to a 2022 salary direction, the J&K High Court held interim orders executable under Section 36 CPC and cautioned judges against unverified AI-sourced precedents.
The High Court of J&K and Ladakh dismissed a writ petition seeking Rs 50 lakh compensation after a court-directed demarcation found the ADP road used only Kahcharai and State land, not the petitioners' proprietary land.
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court set aside a preventive detention order under the PIT NDPS Act after finding the sponsoring officer's dossier omitted a court-rejected bail cancellation application.
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court set aside a trial court order cancelling bail where no misuse of liberty or fresh material had emerged after the original grant.
Justice Sanjay Dhar acquitted the appellant after holding that the school leaving certificate had no probative value and the prosecution could not prove the prosecutrix was under 18 at the time of the occurrence.
Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal held that disputed questions of deviation extent and compoundability cannot be adjudicated under Article 226 when an efficacious statutory remedy exists before the J&K Special Tribunal.
