Latest Chhattisgarh Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
The High Court found that issuing a document-verification notice on the very date fixed for verification violated the State's own circular requiring 20 days' advance notice by Registered Post.
The Bilaspur court found no coercive direction on the face of the impugned order and no material showing actual injury to any student's fundamental rights.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside a 2008 Sessions Court conviction under Section 376(1) IPC, finding the prosecutrix's testimony unsupported by her parents, medical evidence, or forensic results.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh held that official inspection reports carry a presumption of correctness and absence of independent witnesses is not fatal to prosecution under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside a trial court's acquittal in an electricity theft case, ruling that official panchnamas carry a presumption of correctness that the accused failed to rebut.
Dismissing a Navodaya Vidyalaya teacher's plea, the Chhattisgarh High Court held that voluntarily declining promotion four times bars a claim to time-bound financial upgradation.
Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi holds that a teacher's son cannot be denied compassionate appointment for missing a TET deadline the pandemic itself postponed.
Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha dismisses the State's revision, holding that confiscation of a Scorpio vehicle under Section 47-A required proof that seized bottles actually contained liquor exceeding five bulk litres.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh held that the State Backward Class Commission acted beyond its jurisdiction when it directed recovery of Rs. 1,26,500 from a dealer in a commercial dispute.
Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha granted bail to two Punjab residents arrested for illicit liquor transport and ordered the DGP to reconsider action against an ASI who falsely attributed 19 criminal cases to one applicant.
The Division Bench found that tariff and true-up proceedings fastening a Rs 153.55 crore refund liability on Jindal Steel were conducted without affording the company any opportunity of hearing.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh held that rejecting a compassionate appointment claim solely because the deceased employee's mother held a low-paid post, without examining actual family hardship, was arbitrary.
A Division Bench led by Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha held that dismissal founded on a valid conviction is not automatically undone by subsequent acquittal, rejecting a claim for full back wages under Fundamental Rule 54.
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ appeal by a Forest SDO whose transfer cancellation rested on a policy clause that only protects employees with under one year of service remaining.
