Tribunal and commission updates from India's specialist legal forums.
NCLAT remands to NCLT Mumbai a disputed Master Lease Agreement between Orix Leasing and JSK Marketing, directing fresh consideration of fraud and moratorium violation claims.
NCLAT sets aside NCLT's rejection of a director's Section 7 petition over Rs. 6.86 crore interest-free loan, citing procedural failure and unexamined factual questions about the debt's true character.
NCLAT's Principal Bench dismisses Shefali Agrawal's appeal, holding her claims of illegal removal as director and share dilution were time-barred, with knowledge established from 2013.
NCLAT upholds CIRP admission against two Rana Kapoor-linked real estate companies, ruling the loan recall notice of 9 March 2020 validly triggered default under the IBC.
The Competition Commission found the Director General's comparisons of hospital prices with standalone diagnostic labs and procurement costs inadequate to establish unfair pricing under Section 4.
The Competition Commission found the Director General's methodology flawed on relevant market, pricing comparisons, and dominant position, closing the decade-long Section 4 inquiry.
The Competition Commission finds a prima facie case of exclusive dealing under Section 3(4)(b) against Pernod Ricard and linked wholesalers and retailers in Delhi's IMFL market.
The Competition Commission of India dismissed a complaint alleging predatory pricing and market abuse by ride-hailing platform Rapido, finding the charges unsubstantiated under competition law.
The Competition Commission of India declined interim directions against Venkateshwara Hatcheries and related entities, holding the informant failed to meet the high threshold set by the Supreme Court in the SAIL judgment.
NCLAT finds Rs 3.6 crore transferred to Ligare Aviation and immediately routed back to a Religare subsidiary the same day was not a genuine financial debt under IBC.
NCLAT's Principal Bench reverses NCLT Chandigarh's dismissal of nine IBC Section 7 applications filed by J&K Integrated Textiles Park, finding financial debt proved and Section 65 penalty unsustainable.
Uttarakhand Power Corporation's attempt to levy cross subsidy surcharge on mid-term open access consumers fails as APTEL upholds the UERC's interpretation of Regulation 22.
APTEL dismissed GRIDCO Limited's review petition challenging its September 2025 judgment on a revised PPA dispute with Vedanta, finding no error apparent on the face of record.
APTEL rejected BSES Rajdhani and BSES Yamuna's attempt to substitute its reasoned CAG audit ruling and separately pressed DERC to begin regulatory asset liquidation by 16 June 2026.
APTEL refused to stay a 2021 KERC order restoring PPA tariff of Rs.5.07/kWh to a solar developer, finding BESCOM had slept on its rights for over four years.
APTEL rejected Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission's review petitions challenging its 20 April 2026 order on CAG audit and regulatory asset liquidation, granting only a 45-day window for chartered accountant appointment.
APTEL quashes DERC's direction to BSES Yamuna and BSES Rajdhani to pay Rajghat Power House energy bills after their PPAs expired in mid-2015, ruling obligations ceased on expiry.
APTEL refuses to condone delays of up to 5,100 days in appeals against Tamil Nadu tariff orders, finding appellants lacked good faith and diligence under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity dismissed a spinning mills association's challenge to TNERC's 2017 tariff order, upholding TANGEDCO's subsidy relinquishment under the UDAY scheme and approving the cross subsidy surcharge methodology.
The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity partly allowed DVC's appeal against JSERC's true-up order, ruling that a CERC-approved pay revision amount cannot be excluded by a State Commission.
NTPC sought relief for plant shutdowns at Farakka caused by low Ganga Feeder Canal water levels, but APTEL held the situation was foreseeable and self-attributable.
APTEL dismisses Rajasthan distribution companies' appeal, holding that Chhattisgarh forest transit levy became a compensable change-in-law event only from 1 November 2012, after the bid cut-off date.
The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed 23 appeals by Bharatpur sandstone miners challenging environmental compensation imposed by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board for air quality and plantation violations.
The Ahmedabad Tribunal dismissed all twelve Revenue grounds covering transfer pricing, forex hedging losses and R&D deductions, while partly allowing Cadila Pharmaceuticals' cross-appeal.
