Latest Delhi Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
A Division Bench found the Tribunal disposed of seven appeals in an order lacking logic or reasoning, with two different pronouncement dates inexplicably merged into one document.
Justice Girish Kathpalia directed the DCP to probe threat calls received by a cab driver witness in a murder and conspiracy case, criticising the IO's failure to act.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav held that even grave charges cannot bar bail once Article 21's speedy trial guarantee is demonstrably infringed by prolonged, police-caused delay.
The Delhi High Court declined to disturb ad-interim maintenance granted to a wife living separately since 1985, holding that long separation and delay do not extinguish her statutory claim.
Delhi High Court prima facie finds MCC's new NRI quota condition—requiring proof that a sponsor actually raised the student—subjective and an unfair bar to NEET-UG 2026 counselling.
The Delhi High Court held that P.B. Agro LLP could not challenge an FDA Mumbai show cause notice before it, even though the company and FSSAI are based in Delhi.
Hearing clustered contempt petitions, Delhi HC directed the DGPs and Chief Secretaries of Punjab, Haryana and U.T. Chandigarh to explain compliance with Supreme Court directions on Section 41A arrest-notice procedure.
Justice Madhu Jain dismissed a writ petition by six Ukrainian nationals challenging a NIA court order that extended their detention up to 180 days under Section 43-D(2)(b) of the UAPA.
Justice Manoj Jain held that over thirteen years of pre-verdict incarceration, in a kidnapping and double murder case, violated the constitutional right to a speedy trial.
Justice Girish Kathpalia rejected a second modification application targeting the same bail order, and flagged wasteful double assignment of legal aid advocates to a single accused.
Justice Madhu Jain held that reserving a matter for judgment does not render a trial court functus officio for the purpose of recalling a witness under Section 311 CrPC.
Justice Prateek Jalan quashed an FIR under the BNS after parties settled a flat-entry assault, conditioning relief on six sessions of community service and Rs. 10,000 in costs.
The Delhi High Court, led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, has taken up a PIL over the collapse of two PG hostels at Satya Niketan that killed at least seven students.
Justice Madhu Jain declined to interfere with an ASJ's acquittal, holding that DNA evidence confirming paternity cannot, by itself, prove non-consent under Section 376(2)(n) IPC.
A Division Bench found ECI's existing Manual and Draft Electoral Roll extracts sufficient to address exclusion fears, rejecting mandamus for a separate facilitative mechanism.
Six years after the Supreme Court's Constitution Bench recorded his arguments in the Indore Development Authority case, a Senior Advocate and former MP Advocate General has won a writ for unpaid fees.
The High Court found that the inquiry report showed cheating material in a washroom but no evidence the student actually used it during his BNS examination.
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court disposed of a petition by 42 street vendors seeking fixed vending sites, holding that provisional Certificates of Vending permit only mobile vending.
The Delhi High Court has issued a circular limiting entry passes and ID cards for interning law students to third-year LL.B. and fourth- and fifth-year integrated course students only.
The Delhi High Court converted a writ petition challenging mandatory biometric attendance for public prosecutors into a representation, directing the government to decide it within four weeks.
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court rejected a PIL on IFCI's NSE share divestment after finding the petitioner had hidden a prior Bombay High Court writ and made a false sworn averment.
Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani grants PhysicsWallah founder Alakh Pandey interim protection against three specific categories of online violation while warning that personality rights cannot suppress caricature or legitimate expression.
Justice A. J. Bhambhani directed defendants 20 and 21 to take down 552 sexually vulgar URLs within three weeks, while declining a sweeping order covering all 6,884 disputed links.
Justice Amit Bansal declined to entertain a writ petition filed by an advocate-in-person challenging daily traffic gridlock near his Connaught Place office, holding the issue beyond Article 226 jurisdiction.
