Latest Delhi Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
Delhi High Court asks the DSLSA selection committee to conclude the PLV selection process within one month, with an expectation that final-year students receive preference.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav granted bail to two accused in a 2020 murder case, citing six years of incarceration, glacial trial progress, and the IO's persistent non-appearance.
A Division Bench dismissed a writ petition by the Khan Market Welfare Association, holding that courts cannot direct a statutory authority to formulate its own assessment methodology under Article 226.
Justice Sachin Datta attached an ICICI Bank account of FIITJEE's alter ego for Rs 66.31 lakh in rent arrears and barred directors from leaving India.
Justice Girish Kathpalia held that the gruesome manner of the killing outweighed the accused's plea of trial delay, dismissing his regular bail application filed nearly seven years after the FIR.
A thirteen-year-old EWS student rusticated after missing one exam was allowed back in Class-VIII; the court found the school's action illegal under Delhi's own school education rules.
Justice Anish Dayal held that ECIR/DLZO-II/72/2021 could not survive once the EOW's cancellation report in the sole predicate FIR was accepted, and that a belated addendum adding an older, unrelated FIR was legally unsustainable.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav declined bail to wrestler Sushil Kumar in the 2021 Chhatrasal Stadium murder case, holding that hostile witness testimony alone does not constitute a change in circumstances after the Supreme Court cancelled his earlier bail.
Justice A. J. Bhambhani held that the Sentence Review Board's repeated, copy-paste rejections relying solely on offence gravity violated Article 21 and the Delhi remission policy, and directed immediate release of both petitioners.
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court declined interim relief to an 81-year-old OCI Cardholder barred from India, holding that complex questions about the interplay between the Citizenship Act and the Foreigners Act must be finally decided first.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a transfer petition that relied solely on a trial judge's oral remarks as evidence of bias, finding no adverse adjudication to support the apprehension.
Justice Jasmeet Singh held that disputes over NEET-UG 2026 Question 150 raised inferential issues, not manifest errors, placing deference firmly with NTA's expert panel.
Justice Girish Kathpalia rejected eight-week interim bail for an accused in a minor rape case, finding the jail medical report suspect and current treatment adequate at super-speciality hospitals.
The Delhi High Court set aside a trial court's acquittal, convicted the accused of sexual harassment under Section 354A IPC, and directed all district judges to prevent cross-examination that targets a woman's attire or religion.
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court held that an order extending UAPA investigation custody from 90 to 180 days is interlocutory and cannot be appealed under Section 21 of the NIA Act.
Justice Jyoti Singh restrained twelve defendants from exploiting the cricketer's name, image and likeness through AI-generated content and unlicensed merchandise, pending hearing.
Justice Subramonium Prasad modified a March 2026 interim order to explicitly include 44 additional videos Isha Foundation had flagged as per se defamatory in its plaint.
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna remanded the matter after holding that the Special Judge must consider individually whether revealing the identity of Protected Witnesses X-5 and X-11 would endanger their lives.
Justice Manoj Jain dismissed the criminal appeal of former MLA Naresh Balyan, holding that voice recordings, confessional statements and property evidence showed sufficient nexus with the Kapil Sangwan organised crime syndicate.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav refused to issue a writ of mandamus where the petitioner furnished no identity particulars or prima facie material to substantiate allegations of illegal migrants in Delhi.
Justice Amit Bansal held that OpenAI's storage of ANI's news articles to train ChatGPT qualifies as fair dealing under Section 52(1)(a) and that ChatGPT outputs are not substantial reproductions of ANI's works.
The Delhi High Court refused a writ of mandamus directing parole for a Bangladeshi convict serving time for murder, holding that long incarceration alone cannot override the statutory restrictions in the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.
The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal against conviction under Section 376 and Section 363 IPC, finding the prosecutrix's age above 18 and her conduct inconsistent with forcible abduction or rape.
The Division Bench found the petition lacked specific site details or targeted pleadings, making it impossible to issue the sweeping directions sought across all public land in Delhi.
