Latest Uttarakhand Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
A general notice by Northern Railways asking occupants at Jharipani, Mussoorie to vacate within 30 days was quashed for lacking any statutory basis and violating due process.
The Uttarakhand High Court held that an injured claimant who pleaded guilty to rash driving in a criminal case cannot claim compensation before the MACT, as the plea amounts to an admission of sole fault.
The High Court of Uttarakhand found that the food analyst's report gave no reason why "Maha Value" on a snack packet was false or misleading, and quashed penalties imposed on PepsiCo India.
The High Court of Uttarakhand found the arbitral tribunal's circle-rate-based compensation lawful under Section 26 of the 2013 Act, while holding that findings on two other issues were not in accordance with law.
The Uttarakhand High Court quashed a 2018 District Magistrate order cancelling a fair price shop licence after the State admitted the order bore no signature of the District Magistrate.
The Uttarakhand High Court quashed the cancellation of a fair price shop dealer's agreement, holding that a forgery finding based solely on the Panchayat Secretary's denial, without any handwriting expert opinion, is unsustainable.
Uttarakhand High Court holds that without a Departmental Promotion Committee assessment in 2021, AIIMS Rishikesh nursing officers cannot claim Senior Nursing Officer promotion from that year.
The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed a writ petition by an outsourced Forest Department worker whose engagement was ended after he visited an accused in an illicit tree-felling case and disclosed sensitive official information.
The Uttarakhand High Court set aside a Sessions Judge's order directing FIR registration against a Circle Officer and SHO under Section 4 of the SC/ST Act, ruling that an administrative inquiry recommendation is mandatory before any such direction.
Uttarakhand High Court grants bail to two NDPS accused after finding that inventory and arrest memo bore the FIR number before the FIR was registered, casting doubt on recovery proceedings.
The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed a writ petition by two outsourced stenographers who challenged the reversal of their designation from Senior Personal Assistant back to Stenographer.
The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed six writ petitions challenging candidature rejections in a statistical officer recruitment, holding that qualification equivalence cannot be determined by courts or assumed by selecting bodies absent an express rule.
The Uttarakhand High Court quashed FIR No. 18 of 2025 registered at P.S. Mussoorie, finding the dispute over Modi Bhawan essentially civil in nature with both parties already pursuing separate suits.
The High Court quashed two Haridwar FIRs as impermissible successive FIRs but refused to quash two others, finding prima facie cognisable offences in social media posts targeting a political figure.
The High Court of Uttarakhand held that repossessing a commercial vehicle through recovery agents, without notice or due process, violates Article 300A and is unsustainable in law.
The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed Zabir's appeal against conviction under Section 5/6 of POCSO, finding the child victim's testimony credible despite minor inconsistencies in post-incident details.
The Uttarakhand High Court has directed official respondents to respond within three days to a contempt application after finding that a key office memorandum was deliberately withheld from the court.
The Uttarakhand High Court quashed FIR No. 18 of 2025 against members of Radha Swami Satsang Beas, finding the property dispute at Mussoorie already before civil courts.
The High Court of Uttarakhand set aside a Reference Court order that had reduced the deduction on an exemplar sale deed from 50% to 30%, finding no cogent reasoning or supporting evidence for the change.
The Uttarakhand High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal could not compel compliance with an interim order while a stay vacation application filed by the State remained pending and undecided.
The Division Bench held that experience as Principal counts towards professorial experience under UGC Regulations 2018, and declined to sit in appeal over the Selection Committee's recommendation.
The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed a first appeal seeking enhanced compensation for 15.4811 hectares acquired in Village Puhana, affirming the exemplar sale deed and 20% development deduction adopted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer.
The Uttarakhand High Court held that circle rates fixed for stamp duty cannot determine land acquisition compensation, restoring the SLAO's exemplar sale deed-based award.
